Compare commits
No commits in common. "8d312ea19dc4b44452acffdaf4608be9037fafbe" and "7ac0df034356ef0b186f56591b8eff4737adcc44" have entirely different histories.
8d312ea19d
...
7ac0df0343
1 changed files with 61 additions and 19 deletions
80
mandel.s
80
mandel.s
|
@ -176,38 +176,80 @@ next:
|
|||
|
||||
.endmacro
|
||||
|
||||
.macro round16_addsub arg
|
||||
; Round top 16 bits of 32-bit fixed-point number in-place
|
||||
.local zero
|
||||
.local one
|
||||
.local positive
|
||||
.local negative
|
||||
.local neg2
|
||||
.local next
|
||||
|
||||
; no round - 5 cycles
|
||||
; one, pos - 28 cycles
|
||||
; one, neg - 31 cycles
|
||||
; average = 5 / 2 + (28 + 31) / 4
|
||||
; = 5/2 + 59 / 4
|
||||
; = 2.5 + 14.75
|
||||
; = 17.25 cycles average on evenly distributed data
|
||||
|
||||
lda arg + 1 ; 3 cyc
|
||||
bpl zero ; 2 cyc
|
||||
|
||||
one:
|
||||
; check sign bit
|
||||
lda arg + 3 ; 3 cyc
|
||||
bpl positive ; 2 cyc
|
||||
|
||||
negative:
|
||||
sec ; 2 cyc
|
||||
lda arg + 2 ; 3 cyc
|
||||
sbc #1 ; 2 cyc
|
||||
sta arg + 2 ; 3 cyc
|
||||
lda arg + 3 ; 3 cyc
|
||||
sbc #0 ; 2 cyc
|
||||
lda arg + 3 ; 3 cyc
|
||||
jmp next ; 3 cyc
|
||||
|
||||
positive:
|
||||
clc ; 2 cyc
|
||||
lda arg + 2 ; 3 cyc
|
||||
adc #1 ; 2 cyc
|
||||
sta arg + 2 ; 3 cyc
|
||||
lda arg + 3 ; 3 cyc
|
||||
adc #0 ; 2 cyc
|
||||
sta arg + 3 ; 3 cyc
|
||||
|
||||
zero:
|
||||
next:
|
||||
|
||||
.endmacro
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
.proc iter
|
||||
; still working on the fixed-point
|
||||
; should we just use 16-bit adds?
|
||||
; does that require extra rounding?
|
||||
; is the integer precision right?
|
||||
|
||||
; (cx and cy should be pre-scaled to 4.12 fixed point - -8..+7.9)
|
||||
; (cx and cy should be pre-scaled to 6.26 fixed point)
|
||||
; zx = 0
|
||||
; zy = 0
|
||||
; zx_2 = 0
|
||||
; zy_2 = 0
|
||||
; zx_zy = 0
|
||||
|
||||
; still working on the fixed-point
|
||||
loop:
|
||||
; 1644.5 - 2264.5 cyc
|
||||
; iters++
|
||||
|
||||
; iters++ = 2 cyc
|
||||
; 6.26:
|
||||
; zx = zx_2 + zy_2 + cx
|
||||
; zy = zx_zy + zx_zy + cy
|
||||
; round to 6.10.
|
||||
|
||||
; 4.12: (-8 .. +7.9)
|
||||
; zx = zx_2 + zy_2 + cx = 3 * 20 = 60 cyc
|
||||
; zy = zx_zy + zx_zy + cy = 3 * 20 = 60 cyc
|
||||
; 12.20:
|
||||
; zx_2 = zx * zx
|
||||
; zy_2 = zy * zy
|
||||
; dist = zx_2 + zy_2
|
||||
; if dist >= 4 break, else continue iterating
|
||||
|
||||
; 8.24:
|
||||
; zx_2 = zx * zx = 470 - 780 cyc
|
||||
; zy_2 = zy * zy = 470 - 780 cyc
|
||||
; zx_zy = zx * zy = 470 - 780 cyc
|
||||
; dist = zx_2 + zy_2 = 38 cyc
|
||||
; if dist >= 4 break, else continue iterating = 7 cyc
|
||||
|
||||
; shift and round zx_2, zy_2, dist up to 4.12 = 2 * (20 + 13.75) = 67.5 cycles
|
||||
; round zx_2, zy_2, dist to 6.26
|
||||
|
||||
; if may be in the lake, look for looping output with a small buffer
|
||||
; as an optimization vs running to max iters
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in a new issue